Sometimes I think developers should use netbooks as their testing machines. Then they would be hit by performance bottlenecks in much more obvious ways 🙂
This morning, Ed pushed a commit that limits the thumbnail size to 96×96 (previously unlimited) in PiTiVi’s master branch. What this means is that previously, each time you imported a clip into your project, PiTiVi was creating a full-resolution PNG image and storing it into /tmp. Not a good idea. Especially if you work with 720P HD files like me.
So, I had noticed the phenomenon but never reported it thinking it was on purpose. Turns out it was not. Now, I did some benchmarking for Edward before and after his commits, and here are my results.
The benchmark is importing 74 clips (720P H.264 in a .mov container), measured with my stopwatch.
On a Dell Mini 9 netbook with an Atom N270 processor:
- before: 1 minute, 42 seconds
- after: 56 seconds
On a Dell Inspiron 530n with a Core2 Quad Q9300:
- before: 41 seconds
- after: 16 seconds
This is certainly not the only performance problem in PiTiVi at the moment. Anyone experienced in profiling should take a look PiTiVi and report problems. I would personally be very interested if audio waveforms could be generated much faster.
You can check out my main website, find me on Twitter or Mastodon or subscribe to my YouTube channel.